Should Gov. Ted Kulongoski Be Impeached?

Posted by Scott Quick on Nov 2nd, 2009 and filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

The scope of this deception is almost beyond belief. Here’s the headlines from Harry Esteve’s report published in The Oregonian:

State lowballed cost of green tax breaks

State officials deliberately underestimated the cost of Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s plan to lure green energy companies to Oregon with big taxpayer subsidies, resulting in a program that cost 40 times more than unsuspecting lawmakers were told, an investigation by The Oregonian shows.

Records also show that the program, a favorite of Kulongoski’s known as the Business Energy Tax Credit, has given millions of dollars to failed companies while voters are being asked to raise income taxes because the state budget doesn’t have enough to pay for schools and other programs.

The incentives are now under intense scrutiny at the Oregon Department of Energy, which is scrambling to curb their skyrocketing costs.

Energy officials were worried about the impact on the state budget in 2006, when Kulongoski and his staff proposed a dramatic boost in tax breaks to woo wind and solar companies to Oregon — upping the subsidies from a high of $3.5 million per project to as much as $20 million.

According to documents obtained under Oregon’s public records law, agency officials estimated in a Nov. 16, 2006, spreadsheet that expanding the tax credits would cost taxpayers an additional $13 million in 2007-09. But after a series of scratch-outs and scribbled notes, a new spreadsheet pared the cost to $1.8 million. And when energy officials handed their final estimate to the Legislature in February 2007, they pegged the added cost at just $1.2 million for the first two years and $4.1 million for 2009-11.

The higher estimates were never shown to lawmakers. Current and former energy staffers acknowledged a clear attempt to minimize the cost of the subsidies.

Question: Should Gov K be impeached? If the allegations made by the Oregonian are true, that’s likely the least of his problems. One has to consider criminal prosecution as a real possibility.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses for “Should Gov. Ted Kulongoski Be Impeached?”

  1. Bill Dalton says:

    Tar and feathers would be quicker and less expensive.

  2. I’ve been interested in taxations for lengthier then I care to acknowledge, both on the individual side (all my employed life!!) and from a legal standpoint since passing the bar and following up on tax law. I’ve put up a lot of advice and redressed a lot of wrongs, and I must say that what you’ve put up makes impeccable sense. Please carry on the good work – the more individuals know the better they’ll be outfitted to comprehend with the tax man, and that’s what it’s all about.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement